4.6 Article

Influence of defects on structural and electrical properties of VO2 thin films

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3609084

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Army CERDEC [W15P7 T-07-D-P040]
  2. J. F. Maddox Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the structural and electrical properties of (011) preferred polycrystalline (Poly) and multidomain (020) epitaxial (Epi) VO2 thin films grown at different temperature (T-s) and on different substrates with variable defects. These defects cause variation in strain, metal-insulator transition (MIT) temperature (T-MIT), activation energy (Delta E-a), and charge carrier type in insulating phase. Both the Poly-and Epi-VO2 behave n-type conductivity when grown at relative low T-S. As T-S increases, defects related acceptor density increases to alter conductivity from n- to p-type in the Poly-VO2, while in the Epi-VO2 donor density increases to maintain n-type conductivity. Moreover, the strain along monoclinic a(m) axis dramatically reverses from tensile to compressive in both the Poly- (848 K < T-S < 873 K) and Epi-VO2 (873 K < T-S < 898 K), and eventually approaches to a constant in the Poly-VO2 (T-S >= 898 K) in particular. T-MIT decreases with increasing the carrier density independent of the conductive type in the lightly doped Poly- and Epi-VO2; however, this trend is reversed in heavily doped n-type Epi-VO2 with a higher T-MIT due to the formation of large quantity of small polarons related with V4+-V2+ pair. Delta E-a is associated with the carrier density and thus the strain or strained interfacial layer thickness in the Poly- or Epi-VO2. The larger tensile strain or thicker strained layer leads to lower carrier density and higher Delta E-a, while the constant strain produces saturated Delta E-a. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3609084]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available