4.6 Article

First principles calculation of finite temperature magnetism in Fe and Fe3C

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3562218

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. Center for Nanophase Material Sciences, Scientific User Facilities Division
  3. Center for Defect Physics, an Energy Frontier Research Center, U.S. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  4. U.S. DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  5. U.S. DOE, Office of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional calculations have proven to be a useful tool in the study of ground state properties of many materials. The investigation of finite temperature magnetism, on the other hand, has to rely usually on the usage of empirical models that allow the large number of evaluations of the systems Hamiltonian that are required to obtain the phase space sampling needed to obtain the free energy, specific heat, magnetization, susceptibility, and other quantities as function of temperature. We have demonstrated a solution to this problem that harnesses the computational power of today's large massively parallel computers by combining a classical Wang-Landau Monte-Carlo calculation [F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2050 (2001)] with our first principles multiple scattering electronic structure code [Y. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2867 (1995)] that allows the energy calculation of constrained magnetic states [M. Eisenbach et al., Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (ACM, New York, 2009)]. We present our calculations of finite temperature properties of Fe and Fe3C using this approach and we find the Curie temperatures to be 980 and 425K, respectively. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3562218]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available