4.6 Article

X-ray characterization of composition and relaxation of AlxGa1-xN(0≤x≤1) layers grown on GaN/sapphire templates by low pressure organometallic vapor phase epitaxy

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3457149

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Army Research Laboratory [W911QX-09-C-0002]
  2. Dr. Alfred Hung program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A characterization procedure was developed to determine the alloy composition and strain state of Al(x)Ga(1-x)N/GaN(0 < x < 1) heterostructures deposited on c-plane sapphire substrates by low pressure organometalic vapor phase epitaxy. Motivated by a method suggested by Bowen and Tanner for separating the contributions of strain and composition in cubic crystals, we extended the technique to the case of hexagonal crystals by first principles derivation from elastic strain theory. The technique was evaluated using double-axis and triple-axis reciprocal space maps of 200 and 30 nm Al(x)Ga(1-x)N layers. The procedure did not require absolute lattice parameter measurements and relied instead on relative measurements of the layer and substrate peak positions. Symmetric and asymmetric reflections of the film and substrate were measured in the double-axis configuration with omega-2 theta scans. From the peak separation, the strained lattice parameters were determined. Assuming biaxial strain and linear variation of the relaxed lattice parameter with alloy composition, an equation was derived for composition in terms of the strained lattice parameters. The relaxation distribution in the AlGaN was found to be bimodal. Films with mole fraction of Al greater than 0.4 were completely relaxed and thoroughly cracked, while films with mole fraction of Al less than 0.4 exhibited compositionally dependent relaxation about the fully strained state. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3457149]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available