4.6 Article

Field-induced hot-electron emission model for wide-band-gap semiconductor nanostructures

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3481061

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U0634002, 50725206, 60771055, 50972168]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB327703, 2007CB935501]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Guandong Province
  4. Economic and Information Industry Commission of Guongdong Province
  5. Science AMP
  6. Technology and Information Department of Guangzhou City
  7. FANEDD [200927]
  8. Sun Yat-Sen University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For field emission from wide-band-gap semiconductor nanostructures, nonlinear plots on Fowler-Nordheim (FN) coordinates and unacceptably large field enhancement factors (beta(FN)) are often obtained by fitting based on FN equation. In the present work, the field-induced hot-electron emission model is developed and is found to give theoretical findings consistent with the experimental observation. The hot electrons are produced by heating effect of penetration field into the emitting tip of the nanostructure. This energy is expressed by effective electron temperature T-e, which is much higher than the temperature of bulk structure. By combining the effective electron temperature with thermal emission function and Murphy and Good integration function, the relation between emission current density and external field is derived and the field enhancement factor (beta(Te)) can be calculated quantitatively. For evaluation of the theoretical model, ZnO nanostructure is selected as a concrete example. The results are found to agree with experiment findings. Extremely large field enhancement factor is not needed in our model and nonlinear property of saturation region emerges in nature in our calculation. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3481061]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available