4.8 Article

Identification of carbohydrate anomers using ion mobility-mass spectrometry

Journal

NATURE
Volume 526, Issue 7572, Pages 241-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature15388

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Free University Berlin
  2. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbohydrates are ubiquitous biological polymers that are important in a broad range of biological processes(1-3). However, owing to their branched structures and the presence of stereogenic centres at each glycosidic linkage between monomers, carbohydrates are harder to characterize than are peptides and oligonucleotides(4). Methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be used to characterize glycosidic linkages, but this technique requires milligram amounts of material and cannot detect small amounts of coexisting isomers(5). Mass spectrometry, on the other hand, can provide information on carbohydrate composition and connectivity for even small amounts of sample, but it cannot be used to distinguish between stereoisomers(6). Here, we demonstrate that ion mobility-mass spectrometry-a method that separates molecules according to their mass, charge, size, and shape-can unambiguously identify carbohydrate linkage-isomers and stereoisomers. We analysed six synthetic carbohydrate isomers that differ in composition, connectivity, or configuration. Our data show that coexisting carbohydrate isomers can be identified, and relative concentrations of the minor isomer as low as 0.1 per cent can be detected. In addition, the analysis is rapid, and requires no derivatization and only small amounts of sample. These results indicate that ion-mobility-mass spectrometry is an effective tool for the analysis of complex carbohydrates. This method could have an impact on the field of carbohydrate synthesis similar to that of the advent of high-performance liquid chromatography on the field of peptide assembly in the late 1970s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available