4.6 Article

Magnetization reversal of two-dimensional superlattices of Mn3O4 nanocubes and their collective dipolar interaction effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3466983

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [10874006, 20973019, 50725208]
  2. State Key Project of Fundamental Research for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology [2006CB932301]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939901, 2010CB934601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic properties of two-dimensional (2D) paddy-field like superlattices of Mn3O4 cubic nanoparticles have been investigated by magnetization measurements. The 2D ordered structure extends over several microns in size. Each nanocube is of single-crystal about 6 nm in size. The magnetic properties are investigated with the powders dispersed in nonmagnetic n-eicosane to dilute the dipolar interaction. By accounting for the temperature variation effect of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy, K-mag(T), the temperature dependent coercivity, H-C(T), can be well described by the equation, H-C(T)=H(0)k(mag)(T)/m(S)(T){1 - [k(B)T ln(t/t(0))/E(0)k(mag)(T)](3/4)}, in which k(mag)(T)=K-mag(T)/K-mag(0) is the reduced temperature dependent magnetocrystalline anisotropy and m(S)(T)=M-S(T)/M-S(0) is the reduced saturation magnetization. The effects of collective dipolar interaction on the magnetic properties are also studied with the as-prepared powder sample. The apparent magnetic anisotropy is seriously reduced with the presence of dipolar interaction. The switching volume is determined by the analysis on the magnetic measurements both with and without the dipolar interaction effect. There is a discrepancy in the value of switching volume determined by the two different analysis methods. Possible reasons are discussed. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3466983]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available