4.6 Article

Ion yields and erosion rates for Si1-xGex(0≤x≤1) ultralow energy O2+ secondary ion mass spectrometry in the energy range of 0.25-1 keV

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 105, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3139279

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the SIMS parameters required for the quantitative analysis of Si1-xGex across the range of 0 <= x <= 1 when using low energy O-2(+) primary ions at normal incidence. These include the silicon and germanium secondary ion yield [i.e., the measured ion signal (ions/s)] and erosion rate (i.e., the speed at which the material sputters (nm/min)] as a function of x. We show that the ratio R-x of erosion rates, Si1-xGex/Si, at a given x is almost independent of beam energy, implying that the properties of the altered layer are dominated by the interaction of oxygen with silicon. R-x shows an exponential dependence on x. Unsurprisingly, the silicon and germanium secondary ion yields are found to depart somewhat from proportionality to (1-x) and x, respectively, although an approximate linear relationship could be used for quantification across around 30% of the range of x [i.e., a reference material containing Ge fraction x would give reasonably accurate quantification across the range of +/- 0.15x). Direct comparison of the useful (ion) yields (i.e., the ratio of ion yield to the total number of atoms sputtered for a particular species (ions/atom)] and the sputter yields [i.e., the total number of atoms sputtered per incident primary ion (atoms/ions)] reveals a moderate matrix effect where the former decrease monotonically with increasing x except at the lowest beam energy investigated (250eV). Here, the useful yield of Ge is found to be invariant with x. At 250 eV, the germanium ion and sputter yields are proportional to x for all x. (C) 2009 American Institute of Physics. [DOI: 10.1063/1.3139279]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available