4.8 Article

Vertically transmitted faecal IgA levels determine extra-chromosomal phenotypic variation

Journal

NATURE
Volume 521, Issue 7550, Pages 90-U209

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14139

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI08488702, DK7161907]
  2. Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America Genetics Initiative
  3. Rainin Foundation
  4. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  5. NIH [T32AI007163, T32CA009547, P30AR048335, P30DK052574]
  6. W.M. Keck Fellowship from Washington University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proliferation of genetically modified mouse models has exposed phenotypic variation between investigators and institutions that has been challenging to control(1-5). In many cases, the microbiota is the presumed cause of the variation. Current solutions to account for phenotypic variability include littermate and maternal controls or defined microbial consortia ingnotobiotic mice(6,7). Inconventionally raised mice, the microbiome is transmitted from the dam(2,8,9). Here we show that microbially driven dichotomous faecal immunoglobulin-A (IgA) levels in wild-type mice within the same facility mimic the effects of chromosomal mutations. We observe in multiple facilities that vertically transmissible bacteria in IgA-low mice dominantly lower faecal IgA levels in IgA-high mice after co-housing or faecal transplantation. In response to injury, IgA-low mice show increased damage that is transferable by faecal transplantation and driven by faecal IgA differences. We find that bacteria from IgA-low mice degrade the secretory component of secretory IgA as well as IgA itself. These data indicate that phenotypic comparisons between mice must take into account the non-chromosomal hereditary variation between different breeders. We propose faecal IgA as one marker of microbial variability and conclude that co-housing and/or faecal transplantation enables analysis of progeny from different dams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available