4.8 Article

Structural basis for retroviral integration into nucleosomes

Journal

NATURE
Volume 523, Issue 7560, Pages 366-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14495

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [305137]
  2. US National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM082251-06]
  3. US National Institutes of Health [AI070042-08]
  4. Netherlands Centre for Electron Nanoscopy (NeCEN)
  5. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [175.010.2009.001]
  6. European Union's Regional Development Fund through 'Kansen voor West' [21Z.014]
  7. Cancer Research UK [15852, 19342, 15272] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. The Francis Crick Institute [10063, 10061] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. The Francis Crick Institute
  10. Cancer Research UK [10065] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retroviral integration is catalysed by a tetramer of integrase (IN) assembled on viral DNA ends in a stable complex, known as the intasome(1,2). How the intasome interfaces with chromosomal DNA, which exists in the form of nucleosomal arrays, is currently unknown. Here we show that the prototype foamy virus (PFV) intasome is proficient at stable capture of nucleosomes as targets for integration. Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy reveals a multivalent intasome-nucleosome interface involving both gyres of nucleosomal DNA and one H2A-H2B heterodimer. While the histone octamer remains intact, the DNA is lifted from the surface of the H2A-H2B heterodimer to allow integration at strongly preferred superhelix location +/- 3.5 positions. Amino acid substitutions disrupting these contacts impinge on the ability of the intasome to engage nucleosomes in vitro and redistribute viral integration sites on the genomic scale. Our findings elucidate the molecular basis for nucleosome capture by the viral DNA recombination machinery and the underlying nucleosome plasticity that allows integration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available