4.6 Article

Shock induced phase change in KCl single crystals: Orientation relations between the B1 and B2 lattices

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3065522

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE [DE-FG03-97SF21388]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relative orientations between the lattices of the low pressure (B1) and high pressure (B2) phases of shock compressed KCl single crystals were examined using plate impact loading along the [111] and the [110] directions. The B2-phase lattice planes, perpendicular to the loading direction, were determined from transient x-ray diffraction measurements. Two closely spaced diffraction peaks were observed for the [111] loading direction. The lower Bragg angle peak is consistent with a 200 peak of a cubic B2-phase unit cell giving the orientation relation [111](B1) is parallel to [100](B2). The higher Bragg angle peak is not consistent with any peak from either a cubic B1 or a cubic B2 unit cell; the origin of this peak is unknown. Other experiments found no orientation relations; for the [111] loading direction, [111](B1) is not parallel to [211](B2) and for the [110] loading direction, [110](B1) is not parallel to [100](B2). The orientation relation determined for the [111] loading in this work is incompatible with a previously determined orientation relation obtained for the [100] loading [T. d'Almeida and Y. M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 330 (2000)]. This finding suggests that the transformation pathway between the B1 and B2 lattices in KCl crystals depends on the shock compression direction for the B1 phase. The results are discussed in terms of the compatibility between the macroscopic uniaxial strain imposed by shock wave loading and the microscopic rearrangement of atoms leading to the observed orientation relations. (C) 2009 American Institute of Physics. [DOI: 10.1063/1.3065522]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available