4.6 Article

Distribution of iron in multicrystalline silicon ingots

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2956697

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NTNU
  2. SINTEF
  3. IFE
  4. REC
  5. Scanwafer
  6. Elkem Solar
  7. Norwegian Research Council [153207/210]
  8. European project Foxy-Development of solar-grade silicon feedstock for crystalline wafers and cells by purification and crystallisation [SES6-019811]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of iron in multicrystalline silicon ingots for solar cells has been studied. A p- and a n-type multicrystalline ingot were intentionally contaminated by adding 53 ppm wt (mu g/g) of iron to the silicon feedstock and compared to a reference p-type ingot produced from ultrapure silicon feedstock. The vertical total iron distribution was determined by neutron activation analysis and glow discharge mass spectrometry. For the intentionally Fe-contaminated ingots, the distribution can be described by Scheil's equation with an effective distribution coefficient of 2 x 10(-5). The interstitial iron concentration was measured in the p-type ingots. In the Fe-contaminated ingot, it is almost constant throughout the ingot and constitutes about 50% of the total concentration, which is in conflict with the previous studies. Gettering had a large impact on the interstitial iron levels by reducing the concentration by two orders of magnitude. Considerable trapping was observed at crystal defects on as-cut wafers from the same ingot. The trapping was suppressed by gettering. The back diffusion of iron from the ingot top after complete solidification was modeled and found to affect the iron concentration up to a distance of approximately 17 mm into the ingot. The interstitial as well as the total iron concentration of the reference ingot were extremely low and difficult to measure accurately. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics. [DOI: 10.1063/1.2956697]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available