4.6 Article

Effects of charge carrier trapping on polycrystalline PbO x-ray imaging detectors

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 104, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2990765

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of charge carrier trapping on the x-ray sensitivity, resolution, and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in polycrystalline lead oxide (PbO) x-ray imaging detectors are theoretically analyzed. The theoretical models for calculating carrier trapping-limited x-ray sensitivity and modulation transfer function (MTF), and DQE incorporating polyenergetic x-ray spectrum are described. A cascaded linear system model is developed for calculating the spatial frequency f dependent DQE of PbO detectors by incorporating the effects of bulk charge carrier trapping on the MTF and the x-ray interaction depth dependent charge collection efficiency and noise. The theoretical calculations are compared with the published experimental data and show a very good agreement. From the fittings of the sensitivity and MTF curves, the electron and hole ranges in polycrystalline PbO are found to be 3.5x10(-7) and similar to 10(-8) cm(2)/V, respectively. The f dependent noise power spectrum NPS(f) and DQE(f) performances are analyzed as a function of applied electric field and carrier lifetimes. The calculation shows that the carrier trapping is responsible for a 21% reduction in the MTF at the applied field of 1.0 V/mu m at the Nyquist frequency (f(N)) and the aliased NPS at f(N) is reduced to 63% of that at zero spatial frequency. The sensitivity, MTF, NPS(f), and DQE(f) strongly depend on the applied electric field and carrier ranges. It is found that the DQE(f) for fluoroscopic applications can be improved dramatically by simply enhancing the carrier lifetimes through improving material properties of the PbO sample. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics. [DOI: 10.1063/1.2990765]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available