4.6 Article

Influence of gallium supersaturation on the properties of GaN grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2952027

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A thermodynamic supersaturation model for gallium (Ga) was developed to describe GaN growth characteristics in low-pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. The model takes into account the simplified GaN chemical reaction that occurs at the growth interface, Ga+NH(3)=GaN+3/2H(2). The supersaturation was varied in two ways: (1) by the V/III ratio and (2) by the choice of the diluent gas. Two diluent gases were considered: H(2), a commonly used diluent gas, and N(2), a reaction inert gas. The choice of the diluent played a role in the degree of Ga supersaturation; since H(2) is the product in the GaN formation, the addition of hydrogen significantly lowered the supersaturation. Atomic force microscopy revealed that surface morphology was associated with the different Ga supersaturation and the Burton-Cabrera-Frank model was used to relate it to the observed spiral size and terrace width. In addition to growth morphology, the degree of Ga supersaturation also influenced the carrier compensation level in n-type GaN. Secondary ion mass spectrometry studies identified that the trend of carbon incorporation followed that of the compensation level and inversely that of the Ga supersaturation. For samples intentionally doped with Si, it was found that GaN became semi-insulating when the carbon concentration exceeded that of silicon. In general, it has been shown that two growth processes at seemingly different conditions will be equivalent if the corresponding Ga supersaturation is the same. This finding showed that the supersaturation is a much more universal parameter than any other growth parameter alone. (c) 2008 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available