4.6 Article

Complete mitochondrial genome of the brown alga Sargassum horneri (Sargassaceae, Phaeophyceae): genome organization and phylogenetic analyses

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 469-478

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-014-0295-5

Keywords

Sargassum horneri; Mitochondrial genome; Brown alga; Phaeophyceae; Sargassaceae

Funding

  1. 863 Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2012AA10A413]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41206146]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2013HZ004]
  4. Key Laboratory of Integrated Marine Monitoring and Applied Technologies for Harmful Algal Blooms, S.O.A. [MATHAB201408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetics and molecular biology of the ecologically important brown alga, Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh, are poorly known. In this investigation, the complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial (mt) genome of S. horneri was determined using long PCR and primer walking techniques. The mt genome is 34,606 bp in length and contains 3 ribosomal RNA genes, 25 transfer RNA genes, 35 protein-coding genes, and 2 open reading frames (ORFs). The overall AT content of the genome is 63.84 %, and the intergenic spacers constitute only 4.29 %. The genome organization of S. horneri mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is very similar to Fucus vesiculosus except that the counterparts of one putative tRNA(Tyr) gene and ORF379 in Fucus were missing from S. horneri mtDNA. Phylogenetic analyses based on 3 ribosomal RNA genes and 35 protein-coding genes suggest that S. horneri has a closer relationship with F. vesiculosus than other analyzed brown algae. Sargassum horneri is the first species of Sargassaceae to have its mitochondrial genome sequenced. This will provide useful information on both population genetics and molecular evolution of the related species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available