4.6 Article

Comparative study on gastrointestinal microbiota of eight fish species with different feeding habits

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages 1750-1760

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12663

Keywords

feeding habits; fish; gastrointestinal microbiota; genotype; high-throughput sequencing; microbial diversity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31172084, 31372202]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [Y22Z07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo reveal the effects of fish genotype, feeding habits and serum physiological index on the composition of gastrointestinal microbiota, eight fish species with four different feeding habits were investigated. Methods and ResultsThe V1 to V3 regions of 16S rRNA gene were analysed by high-throughput sequencing (454 platform) to compare the gut microbiota of different fish species. A total of 551995 high-quality sequences with an average length of 463bp were obtained from the 48 samples. No significant difference was observed among the detected sequences obtained from fishes with different feeding habits (One-way anova, F=1003, P=0400), but the number of OTUs among different feeding habits was significantly different (One-way anova, F=7564, P<0001). Additionally, significant correlations were detected between the fish genotype and microbial composition (partial Mantel test, all P values=0001) in the stomach, foregut and hindgut. Moreover, different core intestinal microbiota was also noticed in the eight fish species with different feeding habits. ConclusionsFeeding habits and genotype clearly affected the gastrointestinal microbiota of fish. Moreover, the evolutionary process shaped the serum physiological indexes of fish. Significance and Impact of the StudyThis study provided much important information for developing commercial fish feeds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available