4.6 Article

Microbial consortium-mediated reprogramming of defence network in pea to enhance tolerance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages 537-550

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05220.x

Keywords

Bacillus subtilis; biocontrol; microbial consortium; pea; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sclerotinia rot; Trichoderma harzianum

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the potentiality of three rhizosphere microorganisms in suppression of Sclerotinia rot in pea in consortia mode and their impact on host defence responses. Methods and Results: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PJHU15, Trichoderma harzianum TNHU27 and Bacillus subtilis BHHU100 from rhizospheric soils were selected based on compatibility, antagonistic and plant growth promotion activities. The microbes were used as consortia to assess their ability to trigger the phenylpropanoid and antioxidant activities and accumulation of proline, total phenol and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins in pea under the challenge of the soft-rot pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. The triple-microbe consortium and single-microbe treatments showed 1.4-2.3 and 1.1-1.7-fold increment in defence parameters, respectively, when compared to untreated challenged control. Activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway and accumulation of total phenolics were highest at 48 h, whereas accumulation of proline and PR proteins along with activities of the antioxidant enzymes was highest at 72 h. Conclusions: The compatible microbial consortia triggered defence responses in an enhanced level in pea than the microbes alone and provided better protection against Sclerotinia rot. Significance and Impact of the Study: Rhizosphere microbes in consortium can enhance protection in pea against the soft-rot pathogen through augmented elicitation of host defence responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available