4.6 Article

Tracking microbial transport through four onsite wastewater treatment systems to receiving waters in eastern North Carolina

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 835-847

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05105.x

Keywords

dye; microbial; MS2; North Carolina; Septic; tracking; transport; wasterwater

Funding

  1. North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Divisions of Water Quality [319 (h)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To examine microbial transport through properly functioning and failing onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) and its implication in surrounding water quality. Methods and Results: Water samples were collected from monitoring wells near leach lines of OWTS and nearby ditches and receiving surface waters to analyse for Escherichia coli and enterococci. Tracer studies with Rhodamine WT (RWT) and coliphage MS2 were also carried out to understand the fate and transport of contaminants through each OWTS. Escherichia coli and enterococci concentrations were higher around failing than properly functioning OWTS by as much as 85-fold. A storm event resulting in 9.5 cm of rainfall increased E. coli and enterococci concentrations by averages of 4.1 x 10(3) and 7.9 x 10(3) MPN per 100 ml, respectively, in wells close to the OWTS. MS2 persisted in the wastewater distribution boxes of the OWTS for several months and was detected in some outer perimeter wells. Conclusions: Properly functioning OWTS in eastern North Carolina were effective in treating wastewater, whereas the failing OWTS affected the groundwater quality more adversely, especially after a rain storm, but had minor impact on the nearby coastal surface water. Significance and Impact of the Study: The study is the first description of the microbial contaminant signature stemming from properly functioning and failing systems under regular use in a high-priority coastal area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available