4.6 Article

Virus transfer between fingerpads and fomites

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 1868-1874

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04814.x

Keywords

bacteriophage; environmental hygiene; fomites; hand hygiene; quantitative microbial risk assessment; surfaces; virus transfer

Funding

  1. Stanford University
  2. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Virus transfer between individuals and fomites is an important route of transmission for both gastrointestinal and respiratory illness. The present study examines how direction of transfer, virus species, time since last handwashing, gender, and titre affect viral transfer between fingerpads and glass. Methods and Results: Six hundred fifty-six total transfer events, performed by 20 volunteers using MS2, phi X174, and fr indicated 0.23 +/- 0.22 (mean and standard deviation) of virus is readily transferred on contact. Virus transfer is significantly influenced by virus species and time since last handwashing. Transfer of fr bacteriophage is significantly higher than both MS2 and phi X174. Virus transfer between surfaces is reduced for recently washed hands. Conclusions: Viruses are readily transferred between skin and surfaces on contact. The fraction of virus transferred is dependent on multiple factors including virus species, recently washing hands, and direction of transfer likely because of surface physicochemical interactions. Significance and Impact of the Study: The study is the first to provide a large data set of virus transfer events describing the central tendency and distribution of fraction virus transferred between fingers and glass. The data set from the study, along with the quantified effect sizes of the factors explored, inform studies examining role of fomites in disease transmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available