4.6 Article

Hexavalent chromium reduction by bacterial consortia and pure strains from an alkaline industrial effluent

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 2173-2182

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04849.x

Keywords

adsorption; bacterial communities; chromium (VI); reduction; t-RFLP

Funding

  1. ECOS-NORD-SEP-CONACyT-ANUIES [M07A01]
  2. FONCICyT [95887]
  3. Universidad de Guanajuato, Mexico [129/09]
  4. CONACyT, Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To characterize the bacterial consortia and isolates selected for their role in hexavalent chromium removal by adsorption and reduction. Methods and Results: Bacterial consortia from industrial wastes revealed significant Cr(VI) removal after 15 days when incubated in medium M9 at pH 6.5 and 8.0. The results suggested chromium reduction. The bacterial consortia diversity (T-RFLP based on 16S rRNA gene) indicated a highest number of operational taxonomic units in an alkaline carbonate medium mimicking in situ conditions. However, incubations under such conditions revealed low Cr(VI) removal. Genomic libraries were obtained for the consortia exhibiting optimal Cr(VI) removal (M9 medium at pH 6.5 and 8.0). They revealed the dominance of 16S rRNA gene sequences related to the genera Pseudomonas/Stenotrophomonas or Enterobacter/Halomonas, respectively. Isolates related to Pseudomonas fluorescens and Enterobacter aerogenes were efficient in Cr(VI) reduction and adsorption to the biomass. Conclusions: Cr(VI) reduction was better at neutral pH rather than under in situ conditions (alkaline pH with carbonate). Isolated strains exhibited significant capacity for Cr(VI) reduction and adsorption. Significance and Impact of Study: Bacterial communities from chromium-contaminated industrial wastes as well as isolates were able to remove Cr(VI). The results suggest a good potential for bioremediation of industrial wastes when optimal conditions are applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available