4.6 Article

Survival and spread of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in alpine pasture grasslands

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages 1332-1343

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04527.x

Keywords

cowpat; persistence; shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli; soil; virulence

Funding

  1. Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA)
  2. Ministere Francais de l'Ecologie et du Developpement Durable

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To determine the fate of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains defecated onto alpine grassland soils. Methods and Results: During the summers of 2005 and 2006, the field survival of STEC was monitored in cowpats and underlying soils in four different alpine pasture units. A most probable number (MPN)-PCR stx assay was used to enumerate STEC populations. STEC levels ranged between 3 center dot 9 and 5 center dot 4 log(10) CFU g-1 in fresh cowpats and slowly decreased until their complete decay (inactivation rates k < 0 center dot 04 day-1). PFGE typing of STEC strains isolated from faecal and soil samples assessed the persistence of various clonal types for at least 2 months in cowpats and their vertical dispersal down through the soil at a depth up to at least 20 cm. STEC cells counts in soil were always below 2 log(10) CFU g-1, regardless of the pasture unit investigated. The soil became rapidly free of detectable STEC once the cowpat had decomposed. The eight STEC strains isolated during this study belonged to six distinct serotypes and tested positive for the gene(s) stx2, including the stx2g and stx2 NV206 variants. Conclusions: STEC were able to persist in cowpats and disseminate down through the soil but were unable to establish. Significance and impact of the Study: This study provides useful information concerning the ecology of STEC in alpine pasture grasslands and may have implications for land and cattle management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available