4.6 Article

Cell wall component and mycotoxin moieties involved in the binding of fumonisin B1 and B2 by lactic acid bacteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 977-985

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04065.x

Keywords

binding; bioavailability; detoxification; fumonisins; lactic acid bacteria; peptidoglycan; probiotics

Funding

  1. Research Unit for Food Process Engineering and Microbiology, INRA, Thivernal-Grignon, France
  2. CNRS [FRE2326]
  3. Microbial Genetics Unit
  4. INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France
  5. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Opportunistic Pathogens Lab, INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to bind fumonisins B-1 and B-2 (FB1, FB2) in fermented foods and feeds and in the gastrointestinal tract could contribute to decrease their bioavailability and toxic effects on farm animals and humans. The aim of this work was to identify the bacterial cell wall component(s) and the functional group(s) of FB involved in the LAB-FB interaction. The effect of physicochemical, enzymatic and genetic treatments of bacteria and the removal/inactivation of the functional groups of FB on toxin binding were evaluated. Treatments affecting the bacterial wall polysaccharides, lipids and proteins increased binding, while those degrading peptidoglycan (PG) partially decreased it. In addition, purified PG from Gram-positive bacteria bound FB in a manner analogue to that of intact LAB. For FB, tricarballylic acid (TCA) chains play a significant role in binding as hydrolysed FB had less affinity for LAB. Peptidoglycan and TCA are important components of LAB and FB, respectively, involved in the binding interaction. Lactic acid bacteria binding efficiency seems related to the peptide moiety structure of the PG. This information can be used to select probiotics with increased FB binding efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available