4.6 Article

Selective PCR detection of viable Enterobacter sakazakii cells utilizing propidium monoazide or ethidium bromide monoazide

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 1178-1185

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03851.x

Keywords

dead cells; EMA-PCR; Enterobacter sakazakii; PMA-PCR; viable cells

Funding

  1. University of Stellenbosch
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. Erikksen Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: The detection of viable Enterobacter sakazakii cells is important due to the association of this pathogen with outbreaks of life-threatening neonatal infections. The aim of this study was to optimize a PCR-based method for selective detection of only viable Ent. sakazakii cells in the presence of dead cells, utilizing propidium monoazide (PMA) or ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA). Methods and Results: PMA or EMA was added to suspensions of viable and/or dead Ent. sakazakii cells at varying concentrations (10, 50 or 100 mu g ml(-1)) prior to DNA isolation and PCR with Ent. sakazakii-specific primers. At concentrations of 50 and 100 mu g ml(-1), PMA completely inhibited PCR amplification from dead cells, while causing no significant inhibition of the amplification from viable cells. PMA was also effective in allowing selective PCR detection of only viable cells in mixtures of varying ratios of viable and dead cells. EMA was equally effective in preventing amplification from dead cells, however, it also inhibited DNA amplification from viable cells. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the efficiency of PMA for viable and dead differentiation of Ent. sakazakii, as well as the lack of selectivity of EMA for this purpose. Significance and Impact of the Study: PMA-PCR, in particular, will be useful for monitoring the resistance, survival strategies and stress responses of Ent. sakazakii in foods and the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available