4.4 Article

The Analysis of Tropical Cyclone Tracks in the Western North Pacific through Data Mining. Part II: Tropical Cyclone Landfall

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 1417-1432

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-12-046.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese University of Hong Kong
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201045]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012CB955800]
  4. Research Grants Council of the HKSAR government [CityU 100210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This is the second paper of a two-part series of papers on the analysis of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks in the western North Pacific Ocean. In this paper, TC landfalls in the South China Sea and western North Pacific basins are investigated through the data-mining approach. On the basis of historical TC archives, the C4.5 algorithm, a classic tree algorithm for classification, has been employed to quantitatively discover rules governing TC landfall. A classification tree, with 14 leaf nodes, has been built. The path from the root node to each leaf node forms a rule. Fourteen rules governing TC landfall across the Chinese coast have been unraveled with respect to the selected attributes having potential influence on TC landfall. The rules are derived by the attributes and splitting values. From the classification tree, split values, such as 27 degrees N latitude, 130 degrees E longitude, 141 degrees E in the west extension index, and 0.289 in the monsoon index have been shown to be useful for TC forecasting. The rules have been justified from the perspective of meteorology and knowledge of TC movement and recurvature (e.g., deep-layer mean winds and large-scale circulation). The research findings are also consistent with existing results concerning TC movement and landfall. Both the unraveled rules and the associated splitting values can provide useful references for the prediction of TC landfall over China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available