4.4 Article

The Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Use in North America

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 2528-2542

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009JAMC2115.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science
  2. Climate Change Research Division
  3. U. S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725, DEFG02-03ER46030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Refinements in the spatial and temporal resolution of North American fossil-fuel carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions provide additional information about anthropogenic aspects of the carbon cycle. In North America, the seasonal and spatial patterns are a distinctive component to characterizing anthropogenic carbon emissions. The pattern of fossil-fuel-based CO2 emissions on a monthly scale has greater temporal and spatial variability than the flux aggregated to the national annual level. For some areas, monthly emissions can vary by as much as 85% for some fuels when compared with monthly estimates based on a uniform temporal and spatial distribution. The United States accounts for the majority of North American fossil carbon emissions, and the amplitude of the seasonal flux in emissions in the United States is greater than the total mean monthly emissions in both Canada and Mexico. Nevertheless, Canada and Mexico have distinctive seasonal patterns as well. For the continent, emissions were aggregated on a 5 degrees x 10 degrees latitude-longitude grid. The monthly pattern of emissions varies on both a north-south and east-west gradient and evolves through the time period analyzed (1990-2007). For many areas in North America, the magnitude of the month-to-month variation is larger than the total annual emissions from land use change, making the characterization of emissions patterns essential to understanding humanity's influence on the carbon cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available