4.4 Article

Utilizing Spaceborne Radars to Retrieve Dry Snowfall

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 2564-2580

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009JAMC2193.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX07AE29G]
  2. Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dataset consisting of one year of CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) near-surface radar reflectivity Z associated with dry snowfall is examined in this study. The CPR observations are converted to snowfall rates S using derived Z(e)-S relationships, which were created from backscatter cross sections of various nonspherical and spherical ice particle models. The CPR reflectivity histograms show that the dominant mode of global near-surface dry snowfall has extremely light reflectivity values (; 3-4 dBZ(e)), and an estimated 94% of all CPR dry snowfall observations are less than 10 dBZ(e). The average conditional global snowfall rate is calculated to be about 0.28 mm h(-1), but is regionally highly variable as well as strongly sensitive to the ice particle model chosen. Further, ground clutter contamination is found in regions of complex terrain even when a vertical reflectivity continuity threshold is utilized. The potential of future multifrequency spaceborne radars is evaluated using proxy 35-13.6-GHz reflectivities and sensor specifications of the proposed Global Precipitation Measurement dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR). It is estimated that because of its higher detectability threshold, only about 7%-1% of the near-surface radar reflectivity values and about 17%-4% of the total accumulation associated with global dry snowfall would be detected by a DPR-like instrument, but these results are very sensitive to the chosen ice particle model. These potential detection shortcomings can be partially mitigated by using snowfall-rate distributions derived by the CPR or other similar high-frequency active sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available