4.8 Article

Differential DNA mismatch repair underlies mutation rate variation across the human genome

Journal

NATURE
Volume 521, Issue 7550, Pages 81-U173

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BFU2011-26206]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa) [SEV-2012-0208]
  3. European Research Council Consolidator grant IR-DC [616434]
  4. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR)
  5. EMBO Young Investigator Program
  6. EMBL-CRG Systems Biology Program
  7. FP7 project 4DCellFate [277899]
  8. FP7 project MAESTRA [ICT-2013-612944]
  9. Marie Curie Actions
  10. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [616434] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer genome sequencing has revealed considerable variation in somatic mutation rates across the human genome, with mutation rates elevated inheterochromatic late replicating regionsand reduced in early replicating euchromatin(1-5). Multiple mechanisms have been suggested to underlie this(2,6-10), but the actual cause is unknown. Here we identify variable DNA mismatch repair (MMR) as the basis of this variation. Analysing similar to 17 million single-nucleotide variants from the genomes of 652 tumours, we show that regional autosomal mutation rates at megabase resolution are largely stable across cancer types, with differences related to changes in replication timing and gene expression. However, mutations arising after the inactivation of MMR are no longer enriched in late replicating heterochromatin relative to early replicating euchromatin. Thus, differential DNA repair and not differential mutation supply is the primary cause of the large-scale regional mutation rate variation across the human genome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available