4.4 Article

Artificial Neural Networks applied to estimate permeability, porosity and intrinsic attenuation using seismic attributes and well-log data

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 45-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.010

Keywords

The Gamma test; Seismic attributes; Artificial Neural Networks; Permeability; Porosity; Attenuation

Funding

  1. DGAPA-UNAM [IN116114-2]
  2. CONACYT Mexico [212923]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Permeability and porosity are two fundamental reservoir properties which relate to the amount of fluid contained in a reservoir and its ability to flow. The intrinsic attenuation is another important parameter since it is related to porosity, permeability, oil and gas saturation and these parameters significantly affect the seismic signature of a reservoir. We apply Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict permeability (k) and porosity (phi) for a carbonate aquifer in southeastern Florida and to predict intrinsic attenuation (1/Q) for a sand-shale oil reservoir in northeast Texas. In this study, the Gamma test (a revolutionary estimator of the noise in a data set) has been used as a mathematically non-parametric nonlinear smooth modeling tool to choose the best input combination of seismic attributes to estimate k and phi, and the best combination of well-logs to estimate 1/Q This saves time during the construction and training of ANN models and also sets a lower bound for the mean squared error to prevent over-training. The Neural Network method successfully delineates a highly permeable zone that corresponds to a high water production in the aquifer. The Gamma test found nonlinear relations that were not visible to linear regression allowing us to generalize the ANN estimations of k, phi and 1/Q for their respective sets of patterns that were not used during the learning phase. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available