4.4 Article

Estimations of moisture content in the active layer in an Arctic ecosystem by using ground-penetrating radar profiling

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 100-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.003

Keywords

Active layer; Arctic; Ground penetrating radar; Soil water content

Funding

  1. GeoBasis monitoring program
  2. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS)
  3. Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) of Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We applied high-frequency GPR at a study site in the high arctic ecosystem of Northeast Greenland to evaluate its usefulness in assessing depth of, and water content in, the active layer at Zackenberg Valley (74 degrees N; 20 degrees W) to evaluate its usefulness in the high arctic ecosystems. The study site includes different vegetation types, and it well represents of the entire valley, for which we aimed to determine the conditions and characteristics that influence the GPR performance in the active layer. The spatial distribution of moisture content along the transect studied was estimated using GPR data (400 MHz antenna), depth to permafrost, soil samples and vegetation observations. Vertical distribution of the water content in the unfrozen soil bulk was predicted for several points on the transect by combining data that influence the behavior of the radar waves with that of capacitive moisture probes. The statistical models resulted to be highly significant, thus assuming common conditions of the soil to the classified vegetation, we can obtain from the GPR data, truthful estimations of water content, and, moreover, we can predict the distribution to the bottom of the active layer. Hence, we conclude that GPR is a viable option for improving active layer spatial quantification of water contents that can be used to assess changes in the active layer in arctic regions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available