4.7 Article

Efficacy of low doses of amphotericin B plus allicin against experimental visceral leishmaniasis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 3268-3274

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku290

Keywords

Leishmania; hamster; amphotericin; allicin; visceral leishmaniasis

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Competitiveness [AGL2009-39009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of allicin and amphotericin deoxycholate (AmB) in the chemotherapy of Leishmania infantum infection with the final aim of reducing the dose of AmB in the chemotherapy of visceral leishmaniasis. Hamsters were intraperitoneally (ip) infected with L. infantum (10(7) stationary phase promastigotes). On day 45 post-infection animals were treated ip with AmB (1 or 5 mg/kg/day), allicin (5 mg/kg/day) or a combination of AmB (1 mg/kg/day)aEuroS+aEuroSallicin (5 mg/kg/day) for 5 days. Animals were clinically and biopathologically monitored and the antibody response (IgG, IgG(1), IgG(2)) was determined. Parasite burdens were estimated by limiting dilution and AmB biodistribution was determined by HPLC in plasma, kidney, spleen and liver. No clinical signs or liver and kidney alterations were observed. AmB (1 mg/kg/day) did not clear the Leishmania infection and no parasites were detected in two animals treated with 5 mg/kg/day allicin. Combination therapy (5 mg/kg allicinaEuroS+aEuroS1 mg/kg AmB) reduced the L. infantum burden by > 95%. Antileishmanial activity of the combination was comparable (PaEuroS < aEuroS0.05) to the standard AmB treatment (5 mg/kg). Allicin alone (5 mg/kg/day for 5 days) significantly reduced the Leishmania burden in spleen and liver of infected hamsters. Co-administration of allicin (5 mg/kg/day for 5 days) and AmB (1 mg/kg/day for 5 days) showed a partial additive effect on the reduction of leishmanial burden in both target organs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available