4.7 Article

Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection and antibiotics: a meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 68, Issue 9, Pages 1951-1961

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt129

Keywords

community-associated CDI; CA-CDI; C; difficile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibiotic exposure is the most important risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Most evaluations of antimicrobial risk factors have been conducted in healthcare settings. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between antibiotic exposure and community-associated CDI (CA-CDI) (i.e. symptom onset in the community with no healthcare facility admission within 12 weeks) and to determine the classes of antibiotics posing the greatest risk. We searched four electronic databases for subject headings and text words related to CA-CDI and antibiotics. Studies that investigated the risk of CA-CDI associated with antibiotic usage were considered eligible. Data from the identified studies were combined using a random-effects model and ORs were calculated. Of 910 citations identified, eight studies (n30184 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Antibiotic exposure was associated with an increased risk of CA-CDI (OR 6.91, 95 CI 4.1711.44, I(2)95). The risk was greatest with clindamycin (OR 20.43, 95 CI 8.5049.09) followed by fluoroquinolones (OR 5.65, 95 CI 4.387.28), cephalosporins (OR 4.47, 95 CI 1.6012.50), penicillins (OR 3.25, 95 CI 1.895.57), macrolides (OR 2.55, 95 CI 1.913.39) and sulphonamides/trimethoprim (OR 1.84, 95 CI 1.482.29). Tetracyclines were not associated with an increased CDI risk (OR 0.91, 95 CI 0.571.45). Antibiotic exposure was an important risk factor for CA-CDI, but the risk was different amongst different antibiotic classes. The risk was greatest with clindamycin followed by fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins, whereas tetracyclines were not associated with an increased risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available