4.7 Article

Epidemiology and echinocandin susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis sensu lato species isolated from bloodstream infections at a Spanish university hospital

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages 2739-2748

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks271

Keywords

FKS; C; parapsilosis; C; orthopsilosis; C; metapsilosis

Funding

  1. NIH [AI069397]
  2. Merck
  3. Pfizer
  4. Astellas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of this work were to study the epidemiological profiles, differences in echinocandin susceptibilities and clinical relevance of the Candida parapsilosis sensu lato species isolated from proven fungaemia cases at La Fe University Hospital of Valencia (Spain) from 1995 to 2007. The prevalence of these species was: C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, 74.4; Candida orthopsilosis, 23.54; and Candida metapsilosis, 2.05. The incidence of the species complex as agents of fungaemia remained stationary until 2005 and doubled in 2006. The incidence of C. orthopsilosis showed an increasing trend during the study period, while C. parapsilosis sensu stricto incidence diminished. Also, an important epidemiological change was observed starting in 2004, when 86.5 of the C. parapsilosis sensu lato strains were found in adult patients, while before that year only 13.5 of the isolates were found in this population. Echinocandin drug susceptibility testing using the CLSI M27-A3 document showed a wide range of MIC values (0.0154 mg/L), with micafungin being the most potent in vitro inhibitor followed by anidulafungin and caspofungin (MIC geometric mean of 0.68, 0.74 and 0.87 mg/L, respectively). C. metapsilosis was the most susceptible species of the complex to anidulafungin and micafungin in vitro (MIC50 for anidulafungin and micafungin: 0.06 mg/L), while there were no differences between C. parapsilosis sensu lato species when caspofungin MIC(50)s were compared (MIC50 1.00 mg/L). Differences in caspofungin in vitro susceptibility were observed between the different clinical service departments of La Fe Hospital.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available