4.7 Article

Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 66, Issue 9, Pages 1941-1944

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr262

Keywords

genomics; high-throughput screening; antibiotic discovery; antimicrobial discovery; antibacterial discovery

Funding

  1. Cubist
  2. Destiny
  3. Galapagos
  4. Leo
  5. Pfizer
  6. Novartis
  7. Novacta
  8. GSK
  9. Chiron/Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dwindling supply of new antibiotics largely reflects regulatory and commercial challenges, but also a failure of discovery. In the 1990s the pharmaceutical industry abandoned its classical ways of seeking antibiotics and instead adopted a strategy that combined genomics with high-throughput screening of existing compound libraries. Too much emphasis was placed on identifying targets and molecules that bound to them, and too little emphasis was placed on the ability of these molecules to permeate bacteria, evade efflux and avoid mutational resistance; moreover, the compound libraries were systematically biased against antibiotics. The sorry result is that no antibiotic found by this strategy has yet entered clinical use and many major pharmaceutical companies have abandoned antibiotic discovery. Although a raft of start-up companies-variously financed by venture capital, charity or public money-are now finding new antibiotic compounds (some of them very promising in vitro or in early trials), their development through Phase III depends on financial commitments from large pharmaceutical companies, where the discouraging regulatory environment and the poor likely return on investment remain paramount issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available