4.7 Article

A comparison of the activities of lacticin 3147 and nisin against drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 546-551

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp221

Keywords

lantibiotics; antimicrobial peptides; MRSA; VISA; VRE

Funding

  1. Health Research Board (HRB) Ireland
  2. Irish Government under the National Development Plan, through a Science Foundation Ireland [06/IN.1/B98]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/IN.1/B98] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Our goal was to compare the activities of lacticin 3147 and nisin, two of the most well characterized lantibiotics, against antibiotic-resistant staphylococci and enterococci. Methods: We determined the MICs of lacticin 3147 and nisin for 20 strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 20 strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), 6 strains of S. aureus with intermediate resistance to vancomycin (VISA), 5 strains of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and 4 strains of S. aureus that are susceptible to methicillin. Results: Lacticin 3147 displayed potent activity against VRE with MIC values between 1.9 and 7.7 mg/L, and varying levels of activity against S. aureus strains (MRSA, 1.9-15.4 mg/L; laboratory strains, >= 15.4 mg/L; hVISA, 15.4-30.9 mg/L; VISA, >= 61.8 mg/L). Nisin was more active against the S. aureus strains in general (MRSA and laboratory strains, 0.5-4.1 mg/L; VISA and hVISA, 2 to >= 8.3 mg/L), but was less effective than lacticin 3147 against VRE (2 to >= 8.3 mg/L). Conclusions: Nisin is more effective against S. aureus whereas lacticin 3147 possesses greater potency against VRE. The modifications responsible for the vancomycin-resistant phenotypes of hVISA and VISA strains also provide protection against the two lantibiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available