4.6 Article

Does size matter? An investigation of habitat use across a carnivore assemblage in the Serengeti, Tanzania

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages 1012-1022

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01717.x

Keywords

Canidae; carnivore biodiversity; coexistence; East Africa; felidae; habitat use; herpestidae; hyaenidae; macroecology; mustelidae

Funding

  1. Darwin Initiative
  2. Wildlife Conservation Society
  3. St Louis Zoo WildCare Institute
  4. Frankfurt Zoological Society
  5. NSF [EF-0225453, DEB-0343960, DEB-0308486, DEB-0710070, OISE-0804186, DEB-0513994]
  6. Lincoln Park Zoo
  7. Canadian NSERC
  8. Pew Charitable Trusts [2000-002558]
  9. Leverhulme Trust
  10. Heinz Foundation
  11. Wellcome Trust
  12. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  13. Office Of The Director [0804186] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>1. This study utilizes a unique data set covering over 19 000 georeferenced records of species presence collected between 1993 and 2008, to explore the distribution and habitat selectivity of an assemblage of 26 carnivore species in the Serengeti-Ngorongoro landscape in northern Tanzania. 2. Two species, the large-spotted genet and the bushy-tailed mongoose, were documented for the first time within this landscape. Ecological Niche Factor Analysis (ENFA) was used to examine habitat selectivity for 18 of the 26 carnivore species for which there is sufficient data. Eleven ecogeographical variables (EGVs), such as altitude and habitat type, were used for these analyses. 3. The ENFA demonstrated that species differed in their habitat selectivity, and supported the limited ecological information already available for these species, such as the golden jackals' preference for grassland and the leopards' preference for river valleys. 4. Two aggregate scores, marginality and tolerance, are generated by the ENFA, and describe each species' habitat selectivity in relation to the suite of EGVs. These scores were used to test the hypothesis that smaller species are expected to be more selective than larger species [Science, 1989, 243, 1145]. Two predictions were tested: Marginality should decrease with body mass; and tolerance should increase with body mass. Our study provided no evidence for either prediction. 5. Our results not only support previous analyses of carnivore diet breadth, but also represent a novel approach to the investigation of habitat selection across species assemblages. Our method provides a powerful tool to explore similar questions in other systems and for other taxa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available