Journal
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages 342-351Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01778.x
Keywords
abundance; body size; compartmentalization; food webs; leafminers; nestedness; network topology; parasitoids; phylogeny
Funding
- CONICET
- FONCYT-ANPCYT
- National Geographic Society
Ask authors/readers for more resources
P>1. Biological communities are organized in complex interaction networks such as food webs, which topology appears to be non-random. Gradients, compartments, nested subsets and even combinations of these structures have been shown in bipartite networks. However, in most studies only one pattern is tested against randomness and mechanistic hypotheses are generally lacking. 2. Here we examined the topology of regional, coexisting plant-herbivore and host-parasitoid food webs to discriminate between the mentioned network patterns. We also evaluated the role of species body size, local abundance, regional frequency and phylogeny as determinants of network topology. 3. We found both food webs to be compartmented, with interaction range boundaries imposed by host phylogeny. Species degree within compartments was mostly related to their regional frequency and local abundance. Only one compartment showed an internal nested structure in the distribution of interactions between species, but species position within this compartment was unrelated to species size or abundance. 4. These results suggest that compartmentalization may be more common than previously considered, and that network structure is a result of multiple, hierarchical, non-exclusive processes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available