4.3 Article

Perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine at a high dose reduces postoperative analgesic requirements: a randomized control trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 872-878

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1239-8

Keywords

Dexmedetomidine; Postoperative pain; Patient-controlled analgesia

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [21791429, 22659362]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22659362, 21791429] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We hypothesized that a high dose of dexmedetomidine (1 mu g/kg/h) could reduce postoperative analgesic requirements of patients. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study carried out in Tohoku University Hospital. Thirty-two patients who underwent open gynecological abdominal surgery were randomly divided into a control (group C) and a dexmedetomidine group (group D). In both groups of patients, an epidural catheter was put in position prior to the induction of anesthesia, and continuous epidural infusion was started using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump. During the induction of anesthesia, group D patients received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (1 mu g/kg over 10 min), followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 1 mu g/kg/h. The patients in group C received a volume-matched infusion of normal saline as placebo. Consumption of PCEA bolus (local anesthetics) during the first postoperative 24 h, postoperative pain scores, and side effects related to the use of dexmedetomidine were recorded. Dexmedetomidine (1 mu g/kg/h) significantly reduced PCEA bolus consumption [15.9 +/- A 6.5 (group C) vs. 5.3 +/- A 5.0 ml (group D); P = 0.0001] and postoperative pain scores. The infusion of dexmedetomidine produced no serious side effects, such as hemodynamic changes. Among this small patient cohort, perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine (1 mu g/kg/h) resulted in antinociception without severe side effects. These results suggest that this method could be of interest with respect to improving postoperative pain status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available