Journal
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 40-45Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/anatox/35.1.40
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental PathologyTrademark
- ARUP Laboratories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The results of meconium specimens and fortified samples screened for drugs of abuse by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Immunalysis) and biochip microarray (Randox) methods were compared. The ELISA method was semi-automated using a TECAN Genesis. The Randox assay used the Randox Evidence Investigator system. Previously validated gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC MS), GC GC MS, or liquid chromatography-MS-MS methods were used for confirmation and quantitation. Results from the two techniques compared well. Agreement of the Randox assay was greater than 90% when compared to the ELISA assay for all drug classes except cannabinoids (88%). Specificity of the biochip assay was slightly better for amphetamines and cocaine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available