4.7 Article

A simplified protocol for measurement of Ca isotopes in biological samples

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 529-535

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ja50337b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French CNRS/INSU program Interrvie
  2. Bullukian foundation
  3. BioMerieux foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a chemical separation protocol of calcium from biological materials for isotopic measurement by multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICPMS). The method was tested using elution profiles along with HCl and HNO3 acids only, on human urine, sheep serum and red blood cells (RBC), seawater and herbaceous plants. It allows the elimination of all interfering species (including K, Sr, Mg) and the remaining matrix (including Fe, P, Na and S) beyond required levels. In order to further test this protocol and better understand the Ca isotopic signatures of mammalian fluids and organs, we purified and analyzed a wide range of materials from sheep. i.e. serum, RBC, muscle, liver, kidneys, enamel, bone, urine and feces. The data show a wide range of variations, expressed as delta, over 1 parts per thousand per amu, with a precision of 0.1 parts per thousand or better, spanning most of the variability reported so far. Red blood cells appeared to be heavier than serum by 0.3 parts per thousand per amu. This isotopic difference between serum and red blood cells was not taken into account in previous studies and it provides further information on Ca isotopic cycling in organisms. The Ca isotopic compositions of organs are correlated with concentrations, bone and RBC representing the two end-members, bone being Ca rich and Ca-44-depleted and RBC Ca poor and Ca-44-enriched. The trend is compatible with a distillation process by which Ca is extruded from cells along with a kinetic fractionation process favoring lighter Ca isotopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available