4.7 Article

Determination of Fe2+ and Fe3+ species by FIA-CRC-ICP-MS in Antarctic ice samples

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 310-317

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1ja10276a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Siena
  2. IDPA-CNR (Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes, National Research Council)
  3. EU [MIF1-CT-2006-039529, TDI-COSO]
  4. European Commission [243908]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron is an element of great interest due to its role in primary production and in oceanic carbon cycle regulation, such that past changes in iron deposition may have influenced oceanic sequestration of atmospheric CO2 on millennial time scales. The behavior of iron in biological and environmental contexts depends strongly on its oxidation state. Solubility in water and the capacity to form complexes are just two important characteristics that are species dependent. Distinguishing between the two iron species, Fe(II) and Fe(III), is necessary to evaluate bioavailability, as Fe(II) is more soluble and therefore more readily available for phytoplankton uptake and growth. Here, we present a novel analytical method for iron speciation analysis using Collision Reaction Cell-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (CRC-ICP-MS) and apply it to ice core samples from Talos Dome, Antarctica. The method detection limit is 0.01 ng g(-1). A chelating resin, Ni-NTA Superflow, was used to separate the Fe species. At pH 2 the resin is capable of retaining Fe3+ with no retention of Fe2+. After the initial separation, we oxidized the Fe2+ using H2O2, and determined the Fe2+ concentration as the difference between the two measurements. Our preliminary results demonstrate higher Fe2+ concentrations during glacial periods than during interglacial periods. This elevated concentration of Fe2+ suggests that more iron was available for phytoplankton growth during the Last Glacial Maximum, than would be expected from measurements of proxies such as dust mass or total Fe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available