4.7 Article

Determination of four arsenic species in soil by sequential extraction and high performance liquid chromatography with post-column hydride generation and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 376-384

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b820300h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0316181]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0316181] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several procedures, involving various solvents and ultrasound, were evaluated for the extraction of four arsenic species, arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), monomethylarsonate (MMA) and dimethylarsinate (DMA), from a silt loam soil to which species had been added at a concentration of 20 mg kg(-1). The best extraction was by a two-stage procedure: shaking for 24 h in the presence of 0.1 mol l(-1) phosphoric acid followed by shaking for 24 h in 1.0 mol l(-1) sodium hydroxide solution. The arsenic species in the extracts were separated by high performance ion-exchange liquid chromatography, derivatized to hydrides by reaction with tetrahydroborate(III) in a multi-mode sample introduction system (MSIS) and quantified by ICP-OES. Detection limits in solution ranged from 0.4 (As(III) and DMA) to 1 (MMA and As(V)) mu g l(-1), corresponding to 10 and 25 mu g kg(-1) in a 0.2 g soil sample and 5 ml of extractant. The most significant change over time was that As(III) was converted to As(V). When each species was added individually, arsenic was 100% recovered over a period of several months. When all four species were added together, the recovery was 89%. As the precipitation of humic acids was slow, the sodium hydroxide extract could be acidified and analyzed without loss of analyte species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available