4.7 Article

The effect of storage duration on bio-oil properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 118-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.01.015

Keywords

Fast pyrolysis; Bio-oil; Storage; Viscosity; Pyrolytic lignin; Phenolic hydroxyl; Methoxyl

Funding

  1. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ007965]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bio-oil produced by fluidized fast pyrolysis of yellow poplar wood (Liriodendron tulipifera) was stored in sealed glass bottles at 23 degrees C for 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 weeks to investigate the effect of storage time on bio-oil properties. Bio-oil viscosity increased with increasing storage duration, while pH, water content and heating value remained unchanged. Thirty-three components were identified in the bio-oils and were classified into five sub-groups: aldehydes and ketones from carbohydrates, aliphatic phenols, phenolic aldehydes, and phenolic ketones from lignin. The concentrations of the sub-groups, especially the carbohydrate-derived ketones and lignin-derived compounds, gradually decreased with prolonged storage. In contrast, the yield of pyrolytic lignin extracted from bio-oils increased with storage duration from 13.2 wt% (fresh bio-oil; control) to 24.3 wt% (10 weeks). The average molecular weight of pyrolytic lignin also increased from 872 (control) to 1161 gmol(-1) (10 weeks). The amounts of phenolic hydroxyl and methoxyl groups decreased from 11.2 wt% (control) to 8.0 wt% (10 weeks) and 11.9 wt% (control) to 8.6 wt% (10 weeks), respectively. The observations strongly indicate that the low molecular weight components could participate in the re-polymerization with pyrolytic lignin, and the plausible polymerization reactions could be predicted to esterification, oxidation, hemiacetal/acetal formation and olefinic condensation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available