4.6 Article

Tailoring graphene-based electrodes from semiconducting to metallic to increase the energy density in supercapacitors

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 46, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/46/464001

Keywords

supercapacitors; quantum capacitance; modeling

Funding

  1. University of Utah MRSEC (National Science Foundation) [DMR 11-21252]
  2. Department of Energy EBS program [DE-FG02-04ER46148]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-04ER46148] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The semiconducting character of graphene and some carbon-based electrodes can lead to noticeably lower total capacitances and stored energy densities in electric double layer (EDL) capacitors. This paper discusses the chemical and electronic structure modifications that enhance the available energy bands, density of states and quantum capacitance of graphene substrates near the Fermi level, therefore restoring the conducting character of these materials. The doping of graphene with p or n dopants, such as boron and nitrogen atoms, or the introduction of vacancy defects that introduce zigzag edges, can significantly increase the quantum capacitance within the potential range of interest for the energy storage applications by either shifting the Dirac point away from the Fermi level or by eliminating the Dirac point. We show that a combination of doping and vacancies at realistic concentrations is sufficient to increase the capacitance of a graphene-based electrode to within 1 mu F cm(-2) from that of a metallic surface. Using a combination of ab initio calculations and classical molecular dynamics simulations we estimate how the changes in the quantum capacitance of these electrode materials affect the total capacitance stored by the open structure EDL capacitors containing room temperature ionic liquid electrolytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available