4.7 Article

Catalytic coprocessing of waste plastics and petroleum residue into liquid fuel oils

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 141-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.05.002

Keywords

Waste plastic recycling; Coprocessing; Catalysis; Zeolites; Hydrocracking; Residue upgrading; Fuel oils

Funding

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [AR-18-22]
  2. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Waste plastics of different types were catalytically coprocessed with petroleum residue of light Arabian crude oil in the presence of a number of catalysts. The purpose of the study was to explore effects of various conditions such as catalyst type, amount of catalyst, reaction time, pressure and temperature on the product distribution. The waste plastic studied included low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polystyrene (PS) and polypropylene (PP). A series of single (waster plastic with catalyst) and binary (waste plastic and residue with catalyst) reactions were carried out in an autoclave reactor under variable reaction conditions. The reaction conditions used were 1, 3 and 5 wt.% catalysts, 30-120 min reaction time, 400-430 degrees C reaction temperature and 500-1200 psi hydrogen pressure. The product distribution achieved for resiclue/plastic/catalyst system showed higher yields of liquid fuels as compared to residue/plastic system. Hydrocarbon gases were formed as well along with heavy oils, insoluble gums and coke. At the reaction conditions of 3 wt.% NiMo catalyst, 90 min reaction time, 1200 psi hydrogen gas pressure, 430 degrees C temperature and residue to plastic feed ratio of 3:2 (wt.) afforded maximum conversion of the plastics into liquid fuel oils. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available