4.5 Article

Decreased Cerebrospinal Fluid Levels of L-Carnitine in Non-Apolipoprotein E4 Carriers at Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 223-232

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-132063

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; APOE4; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; L-carnitine

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Brain Power from Sweden
  2. Gun och Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse from Sweden
  3. Karolinska Institutet fund for geriatric research from Sweden
  4. Stiftelsen Gamla Tjanarinnor from Sweden
  5. Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne from Sweden
  6. Stiftelsen Dementia from Sweden
  7. Demensforbundet from Sweden
  8. Stockholm County Council from Sweden
  9. Karolinska Institutet from Sweden
  10. Alzheimerfonden from Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence suggest that Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disorder that includes several subtypes with different etiology and progression. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is being used to find new biomarkers reflecting the complexity of the pathological pathways within this disease. We used CSF and clinical data from patients to investigate the status of asymmetric dimethyl-L-arginine, creatine, suberylglycine, and L-carnitine along AD progression. These molecules play important roles in mitochondrial function and dysfunction in mitochondrial metabolism are involved in AD pathology. We found that non-APOE4 carriers show lower levels of L-carnitine in CSF early in AD. L-carnitine levels correlate with amyloid-beta (A beta) levels and Mini-Mental State Examination score, but do not add to the specificity or sensitivity of the classical AD CSF biomarkers, A beta(42), phospho-tau, and total-tau. Our results suggest APOE genotype-dependent differences in L-carnitine synthesis or metabolism along AD, and insinuate that L-carnitine treatments would be more beneficial for AD patients not carrying the APOE4 isoform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available