4.7 Article

Electrochemical deposition and characterization of ZnOS thin films for photovoltaic and photocatalysis applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 769, Issue -, Pages 201-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.327

Keywords

ZnOS; Electrochemical deposition; Graded bandgap; Solar cell; Thin film

Funding

  1. University of the Free State, South Africa
  2. Federal, University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria
  3. project NUCLEU
  4. ELI [17/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical deposition of zinc oxysulphide (ZnOS) thin films for possible photovoltaic and photocatalysis applications has been carried out using zinc acetate and sodium thiosulphate precursors in a simple two-electrode deposition set-up. The deposited films were characterized for their structural, optical, morphological and compositional properties using glancing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD), UV-Vis spectrophotometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy respectively. The detailed characterization results show that the ZnOS materials grown at different cathodic potentials of 1450 mV, 1500 mV and 1550 mV display desirable properties for the intended applications. Structural analysis shows that the films were formed by a combination of hexagonal ZnS and ZnO crystal phases. The energy bandgap estimated for the films across the explored potentials is in the range (2.68-3.26) eV for as-deposited films and (2.90-3.10) eV after annealing. These values and the transmittance were also shown to be increased significantly by reducing the deposition duration. SEM images show very compact and densely packed grains in the films while EDX results show Zn/S values of approximately unity and Zn/O values of approximately 0.1 across the deposition potentials explored, in both as-deposited and annealed conditions. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available