Journal
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 399-405Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12627
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- VA Office of Academic Affiliations through the VA/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars program
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [5K12 HL109005]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
ObjectivesDespite the potential benefits of shared decision-making (SDM), its integration into emergency care is challenging. Emergency physician (EP) perceptions about the frequency with which they use SDM, its potential to reduce medically unnecessary diagnostic testing, and the barriers to employing SDM in the emergency department (ED) were investigated. MethodsAs part of a larger project examining beliefs on overtesting, questions were posed to EPs about SDM. Qualitative analysis of two multispecialty focus groups was done exploring decision-making around resource use to generate survey items. The survey was then pilot-tested and revised to focus on advanced diagnostic imaging and SDM. The final survey was administered to EPs recruited at four emergency medicine (EM) conferences and 15 ED group meetings. This report addresses responses regarding SDM. ResultsA purposive sample of 478 EPs from 29 states were approached, of whom 435 (91%) completed the survey. EPs estimated that, on average, multiple reasonable management options exist in over 50% of their patients and reported employing SDM with 58% of such patients. Respondents perceived SDM as a promising solution to reduce overtesting. However, despite existing research to the contrary, respondents also commonly cited beliefs that 1) many patients prefer that the physician decides, 2) when offered a choice, many patients opt for more aggressive care than they need, and 3) it is too complicated for patients to know how to choose. ConclusionsMost surveyed EPs believe SDM is a potential high-yield solution to overtesting, but many perceive patient-related barriers to its successful implementation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available