4.7 Article

Structural, optical, and surface properties of WO3 thin films for solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 617, Issue -, Pages 609-615

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.047

Keywords

Oxide materials; Semiconductors; Thin films; Energy storage materials; Optical properties

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-EE0005317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transparent back contacts can be used in thin film solar cells facilitating their potential application in tandem cells, bifacial devices and solar windows. In this study, tungsten oxide (WO3) thin films were deposited by Radio Frequency (RF) reactive sputtering in Ar + 02 ambient. The effects of post deposition anneals in air on the structural, optical, and surface properties of the deposited films were investigated using X-ray diffraction, UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. As-deposited films exhibited amorphous structures with no change after annealing at 300 degrees C. Samples annealed at 400 and 500 degrees C were crystallized and identified as pure monoclinic WO3 phase with (200) and (002) preferred orientation, respectively, determined by XRD fiber texture analysis. Scherrer analysis of excess broadening indicated a coherency length of 50 and 65 nm for the 400 and 500 degrees C annealed films, respectively. High resolution XPS studies showed the presence of W6+ (WO3) oxidation states at the surface of the as-deposited and the 300 degrees C annealed films. Annealing at 400-500 degrees C led to an oxygen deficient surface with a sub-stoichiometric WO3-x phase. UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometry revealed that post processing decreased the optical bandgap from 3.30 eV for the as-deposited films to 3.17 eV for the 500 degrees C annealed films. Results are compared with MoO3 films deposited by a similar technique. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available