4.7 Article

Phase formation in as-solidified and heat-treated Al-Si-Cu-Mg-Ni alloys: Thermodynamic assessment and experimental investigation for alloy design

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 551, Issue -, Pages 596-606

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.182

Keywords

Al-Si casting alloys; Thermodynamic calculations; Nickel intermetallic precipitates; Aluminum engine alloys

Funding

  1. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council) of Canada
  2. Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA)
  3. REGAL (FQRNT Regroupement Aluminum Research Center)
  4. McGill University through the MEDA (McGill Engineering Doctoral Award) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermodynamic simulations based on the CALPHAD method have been carried out to assess the phase formation in Al-7Si-(0-1)Ni-0.5Cu-0.35Mg alloys (in wt.%) under equilibrium and non-equilibrium (Scheil cooling) conditions. Calculations showed that the T-Al9FeNi, gamma-Al7Cu4Ni, delta-Al3CuNi and epsilon-Al3Ni phases are formed at different Ni levels. By analyzing the calculated isothermal sections of the phase diagrams it was revealed that the Ni:Cu and Ni:Fe ratios control precipitation in this alloy system. In order to verify the simulation results, microstructural investigations in as-cast, solution treated and aged conditions were carried out using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Furthermore, cooling curve analysis (CCA) was also performed to determine the freezing range of the new alloys and porosity formation during solidification. Hardness measurements of the overaged samples showed that in this alloy system the delta-Al3CuNi phase has a greater influence on the overall strength of the alloys compared to the other Ni-bearing precipitates. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available