4.7 Article

Evidence by EPR of ferromagnetic phase in Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles annealed at different temperatures

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 551, Issue -, Pages 502-507

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.183

Keywords

Ferromagnetic phase; Nanoparticles; Wet chemical synthesis; Electron paramagnetic resonance

Funding

  1. CNCSIS-UEFISCSU [4/2010, 106, 574, 12467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the influence of the temperature annealing (T-a) on the structural, morphological, Raman and EPR characteristics of Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles. XRD studies reveal a wurzite-type structure, while the formation of ZnMnO3 secondary phase was evidenced only for the nanoparticles annealed at T-a = 700 degrees C. This impurity phase was also identified by Raman scattering in the samples thermally treated at 600 degrees C and higher temperatures. TEM investigations reveal that the average particle size of samples starts from 13 nm. With the increase of synthesis temperature, the average particle size reaches a value of 55 nm for 700 degrees C. From the XPS spectrum of Mn 2p core-level doublet only the 2+ valence state for manganese ions was evidenced. EPR investigations show that depending on the annealing temperature, Mn ions are incorporated either in the interior of ZnO nanoparticles (T-a = 425 and 500 degrees C) or at their surfaces (T-a > 500 degrees C). For the sample annealed at T-a = 425 degrees C, a new broad resonance line arises, which was attributed to a ferromagnetic phase. We assume that this ferromagnetic phase could be due to the interaction between the Mn2+ ions and uncompensated acceptor defects incorporated into the ZnO lattice during the thermal treatment of the samples. Our investigations show that the ferromagnetism in Mn-doped ZnO nanoparticles could appear in the low-temperature annealed samples and disappears in the samples thermally treated at high temperatures. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available