4.7 Article

Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of the PbSe1-xTex alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 509, Issue 13, Pages 4516-4519

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.033

Keywords

PbSe thermoelectric materials; Mechanical alloying; SPS sintering; Thermoelectric property

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50871070, 51003060]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Grant [CXB200903090012A, JC200903120109A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The PbSe1-xTex alloys with x=0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.85 and 1.0 were prepared by induction melting, ball milling and spark plasma sintering techniques. The thermoelectric properties of the samples were investigated. The XRD analysis indicated that all samples are NaCl-type structure solid solutions Pb(Se,Te) containing nanograins. Increasing Te content resulted in increasing the lattice parameter a. The thermoelectric measurements show that all samples are n-type semiconductors in temperature range from 300 K to 673 K. The electrical resistivity of the doped sample is much smaller than that of pure PbSe, but comparable to that of PbTe. The absolute Seebeck coefficients for the doped sample PbSe1-xTex with x = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 range from 150 mu V/K at 300 K to 250 mu V/K at 673 K, which is much larger than that of pure PbSe (66-138 mu V/K), but smaller than that of PbTe (230-310 mu V/K) in the same experimental conditions. The thermal conductivity for the doped sample PbSe1-xTex with x=0.2. 0.3 and 0.5 range from 0.95 to 0.66 W/m K, which is much smaller than that of pure PbSe (2.1-1.3 W/m K) or PbTe (1.4-1.1 W/m K). As a result, the figure of merit for the doped sample can be enhanced. The maximum dimensionless figure of merit ZT of 1.15 was obtained in the sample PbTe0.5Se0.5 at 573 K. more than 50% higher than that of pure PbTe prepared in the same condition. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available